The journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Every proposal submitted for publication is read at least by an editor, for an initial review. If the paper agrees with editorial policies and with a minimum quality level, is sent to two reviewers. The reviewers won't know the author's identity, as any identifying information will be stripped from the document before review.

Reviewers comments to the editors are confidential and before passing on to the author will made anonymous. Based on the reviewers comments, Editorial Board makes a final decision on the acceptability of the article and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees reports. Whether significant revisions are proposed, acceptance is dependent on whether the author can deal with those satisfactorily.